This guide compares Natt & Herrick (N&H) solution to three commonly used options—Türk’s solution, Giemsa, and eosin-based diluents—with a focus on:
-
preservation of cell morphology,
-
ease of identification in the counting field, and
-
compatibility with manual hemocytometer counts (Neubauer/Improved Neubauer).
It’s written for research use (non-diagnostic) and tuned for practical lab decisions.
Quick takeaways
-
Natt & Herrick is the go-to for species with nucleated erythrocytes (birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish). It preserves all circulating cell classes in suspension and lets you count WBCs, RBCs, and thrombocytes in the same chamber.
-
Türk’s is the workhorse for mammalian leukocyte counts: it lyses RBCs (acetic acid) and stains WBC nuclei (gentian/crystal violet) for rapid WBC counting.
-
Giemsa is a smear stain (Romanowsky type)—excellent for morphology and differential counts on slides, not a counting diluent for hemocytometers.
-
Eosin-based diluents are best thought of as contrast/viability aids in hemocytometers (dead cells uptake eosin); they are not nucleus-specific and provide limited leukocyte subclass discrimination in the chamber.
What each reagent was designed to do
-
Natt & Herrick: isotonic dye/diluent that differentially colors blood cells without lysing them. Developed to enable direct counts of WBCs and RBCs when erythrocytes are nucleated (avian/reptile). Commonly includes brilliant cresyl blue (nuclear affinity) and a basic dye for general contrast in a buffered, osmotically balanced medium.
-
Türk’s: glacial acetic acid to lyse mammalian RBCs + gentian/crystal violet to stain WBC nuclei—fast, high-contrast leukocyte totals in mammals.
-
Giemsa: methylene blue/azure + eosin Y; binds nucleic acids and cytoplasmic components for fine morphology on fixed blood smears; used for differentials, parasites, and cytology—not for chamber dilutions.
-
Eosin-based diluents: aqueous eosin Y (often 0.1–0.5%) sometimes with nigrosin or isotonic salts; provide vital exclusion (dead cells stain) and general contrast for counting total cells or viability in mixed suspensions. Rarely used to purpose-stain leukocyte nuclei.
Compatibility with manual hemocytometer counts
-
N&H: Excellent for total WBC/RBC in nucleated-RBC species; also usable for mammalian WBC with training. Thrombocytes can be recognized by small size/clumped appearance.
-
Türk’s: Best for mammalian WBC (RBCs lysed → clean field). Not for RBC counting (cells are gone).
-
Giemsa: Not used in chambers—prepare a smear, stain, and perform differential or morphologic assessment.
-
Eosin diluents: Usable for total cell counts and viability (dead cells eosin-positive). Leukocyte subclass ID is limited in the chamber.
Detailed comparison table
| Property | Natt & Herrick | Türk’s solution | Giemsa | Eosin-based diluents |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary purpose | Simultaneous WBC/RBC counting in species with nucleated RBCs; also workable for mammalian WBC | Mammalian WBC counting (RBCs lysed) | Smear morphology & differential; not a diluent | General contrast / viability in chamber |
| Key chemistry | Isotonic buffer + brilliant cresyl blue (nuclei) ± basic dye | Acetic acid (RBC lysis) + gentian/crystal violet (WBC nuclei) | Romanowsky (methylene blue/azures + eosin Y) | Eosin Y (acidic dye), sometimes nigrosin |
| Action on RBCs | Preserved (nucleated RBCs visible) | Lysed (mammals) → clear field | Fixed & stained on smear | Preserved (live cells exclude; dead stain) |
| WBC identification in chamber | Good: nuclei stained; requires practice to separate lymphocytes vs thrombocytes in birds/reptiles | Very good: strong nuclear contrast; easy WBC totals | Excellent on smear (granules/nuclei) | Poor–fair: not nucleus-specific; mainly live/dead |
| Morphology preservation | Suspension preserved; decent nuclear detail; limited granule resolution | Nuclear silhouettes; cytoplasm less detailed | Best (on smear): full nuclear & cytoplasmic detail | Limited; outlines & dead-cell uptake only |
| Best species/context | Avian/reptile/amphibian/fish; mixed field counts | Mammals (non-nucleated RBCs) | Any species (slide-based) | Mixed cell suspensions, viability checks |
| Counts possible in chamber | WBC, RBC, ± thrombocytes | WBC only | Not applicable (use smear) | Total cells, viability % |
| Ease & speed | Moderate (mixing + brief incubation; training for ID) | Fast (1–2 min prep) | Slower (fix/stain/rinse/dry) | Fast (mix, load, count) |
| Interferences | Thrombocyte clumping; dye precipitates if old; thorough mixing needed | Over- or under-lysis if old/incorrect acid; debris can mimic nuclei | Smear quality dependent; precipitate if pH/buffer off | Erythrocyte background if dense; weak nuclear contrast |
| Typical dilutions | 1:100–1:200 for WBC; higher for RBC (species-dependent) | 1:10–1:20 for WBC | N/A (smear) | 1:1–1:10 (sample dependent) |
| Pros | Counts multiple classes in one load; ideal for nucleated RBC species | Clean field; very easy WBC totals in mammals | Gold standard morphology | Cheap, quick viability/total counts |
| Cons | Training needed; slower than Türk’s; formula factors must be tracked | No RBC count; not valid for nucleated RBC species | Not a counting diluent; time-consuming | Poor leukocyte subclass ID; limited hematology specificity |
Practical guidance and method notes
When to pick Natt & Herrick
-
Working with avian, reptilian, amphibian, or fish blood (nucleated erythrocytes).
-
You want total WBC + RBC (and optionally thrombocytes) from one chamber load.
-
You’re prepared to do careful mixing and sharpen recognition of small thrombocytes vs lymphocytes.
Tips
-
Mix gently but thoroughly (avoid bubbles).
-
Allow brief staining time (e.g., 1–5 min) for consistent nuclear uptake.
-
For thrombocytes, look for small discoid cells with dense, often clumped distributions near feathered edges of the grid.
When to pick Türk’s solution
-
Mammalian samples where a fast WBC total is needed.
-
You prefer a clear counting field (RBCs lysed).
Tips
-
Verify reagent freshness (acetic acid strength matters).
-
Mix 1:10–1:20, wait ~1–2 minutes to complete lysis.
-
Count WBCs in the four large corner squares (Improved Neubauer) and average.
When to pick Giemsa
-
You need morphology/differentials (lymphocytes vs monocytes vs granulocytes) or to inspect parasites.
-
You are preparing blood smears; this is complementary to chamber counts, not a replacement.
Tips
-
Use fresh buffered Giemsa (pH ~6.8–7.2) for reproducible Romanowsky effect.
-
Ensure thin, even smears; air-dry and fix with methanol before staining.
When to pick eosin-based diluents
-
Fast total cell counts or viability (dead cells eosin-positive) in suspensions (e.g., cultured cells, mixed leukocytes).
-
Hematology detail not required; you mainly need live/dead discrimination.
Tips
-
Keep contact time consistent (avoid over-staining).
-
Pair with nigrosin (dark background) for improved contrast in some applications.
Counting math (Improved Neubauer, quick reference)
For a 0.1 mm chamber depth and 1 mm² area per large square:
-
Cells per mL = (Averagecountperlargesquare)×(Dilutionfactor)×∗∗104∗∗(Average count per large square) × (Dilution factor) × **10⁴**(Averagecountperlargesquare)×(Dilutionfactor)×∗∗104∗∗ / (Number of large squares counted)
-
Cells per µL = (Cells per mL) / 1000
Examples
-
Mammalian WBC with Türk’s, count 4 large squares:
Cells/mL = (Avg per square × DF × 10⁴) / 4 -
Avian WBC with N&H, if you count the entire central 1 mm² grid:
Cells/mL = (Count × DF × 10⁴)
Always specify: dilution, squares counted, and grid used in your notes.
Common pitfalls & fixes
-
Uneven distribution / streaking → Mix gently and load without bubbles; allow cells to settle ~30–60 s.
-
Debris miscounted as WBC nuclei (Türk’s) → Use fresh reagent, check under higher magnification; confirm nuclear morphology.
-
Thrombocytes counted as lymphocytes (N&H) → Practice morphological cues; consider parallel smear for training until confident.
-
Precipitate / crystals (any) → Filter or replace aged stains; ensure buffers and pH are correct.
-
Inconsistent volumes → Use calibrated capillary pipettes; avoid overfilling the chamber.
Decision tree (what to use, fast)
-
Mammal blood, need fast WBC total → Türk’s.
-
Bird/reptile/amphibian/fish blood; want WBC + RBC same load → Natt & Herrick.
-
Need detailed morphology/differential → Prepare smear + Giemsa (complements chamber counts).
-
Mixed suspension / viability → Eosin-based diluent (live/dead), optionally pair with chamber counts from another stain if leukocyte detail is needed.
Example reporting templates
Türk’s (mammalian WBC):
“WBC = 7.8 × 10³ cells/µL (Türk’s 1:20; 4 large squares; average 39 cells/square).”
Natt & Herrick (avian WBC + RBC):
“WBC = 18.2 × 10³ cells/µL; RBC = 2.1 × 10⁶ cells/µL (N&H 1:200; central grid for WBC; five RBC micro-squares).”
Eosin viability:
“Total = 1.1 × 10⁶ cells/mL; viability = 92% (eosin-negative/live).”
Summary table (advantages & limitations in hematology)
| Reagent | Hematological strengths | Limitations | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natt & Herrick | Counts WBC, RBC, ± thrombocytes in one chamber; preserves nucleated RBCs; suitable for non-mammalian blood | Requires training for thrombocyte vs lymphocyte; slower than Türk’s; must control mixing/time | Avian/reptile/amphibian/fish blood; comprehensive chamber counts |
| Türk’s | Very fast mammalian WBC total; high nuclear contrast; simple arithmetic | Destroys RBCs (no RBC count); not for nucleated RBC species | Mammalian leukocyte totals in routine labs |
| Giemsa | Gold-standard morphology & differentials; parasite screening | Not a diluent; slide workflow; slower | Differential counts & morphology (any species) |
| Eosin-based | Rapid viability and total counts in suspensions; inexpensive | Poor leukocyte subclass ID; limited hematology specificity | Viability checks; general cell suspensions; quick totals |
Final notes (good lab practice)
-
Match the stain to the biological question: totals vs differential vs viability.
-
For quality assurance, pair hemocytometer totals with an occasional smear (Giemsa) to validate your identification skills, especially when adopting Natt & Herrick in new species.
-
Record everything: dilution, squares, grid, microscope objective, and any deviations from SOPs.
If you’d like, I can turn this into a downloadable SOP (1-page quick protocol + plate-side formula card) and a laminated bench chart with the comparison tables.
